Bialek鈥檚 resume and a trail of public records indicates that changing jobs has been a regular occurrence for the Chicagoan. She has worked for at least nine different employers over the past 17 years and appears to have struggled financially.
The public record on Bialek begins in 1991 when she filed personal bankruptcy for the first time while living in Des Plaines.
Between 1993 and 1996 Bialek worked for four different companies in promotion and marketing positions.
In 1996, and part of 1997, Bialek was at the National Restaurant Association. After being let go from that job in mid-1997, she says that she went to Washington, D.C., to meet with Cain, president of the association, because she needed a job.
Ms. Bialek was unemployed and living in Chicago. But she had the time and money to go to Washington, DC, rent a hotel room two blocks from the White House, to approach the CEO of the NRA for a job?
She had been employed by the NRA for less than eight months in a low level position, and she thought the CEO would help her?
In 1999, Bialek鈥檚 son Nicholas was born and a paternity lawsuit was filed by the father, a media executive.
A media executive who reportedly works for Rupert Murdoch鈥檚 News Corp.
In 2001 came Bialek鈥檚 second personal bankruptcy, filed after sizable legal bills.
http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/iteam%26amp;id=8422203|||Bialek looks like Tammy Faye Bakker and Gennifer Flowers all rolled into one skank.|||So having a lot of jobs and struggling financially is akin to sexual assault?
You Cons are getting more desperate with every attempt to discredit these women and side with the creepy Cain.
Get a grip. Would you like it if anyone did this to your mother, daughter, girlfriend, sister, wife, or significant other?
If so, you're as creepy as Cain.|||A. you cited the liberal media?
B. what does this have to do with her allegation? beyond that, YOU'RE MAKING allegations with no facts yourself? why do cons ALWAYS make TONS OF ALLEGATIONS WITH ZERO FACTS and then get mad when people ask legitimate questions about actual facts?|||Same reason Right Wing media is not reporting fairly on Herman Cain's checkered past -- which includes sexual assault on at least one reported occasion.|||So where is the "checkered past"? You tell about a woman struggling to make a living. You have a problem with surviving?
Do you work for the Koch Brothers too?|||Simple...
Because they are the liberal media. They hate conservatives and everything they stand for.|||Don't worry about her past worry about the criminal charges Cain is about to face.|||Liberal media? ? ?|||Because attacking the victims is a Democrat tactic reserved for when Democrat politicians are rapists.|||She says she's NOT filing a lawsuit. (She knows better.) Herman Cain SHOULD file a lawsuit.|||So you're attacking her because she's poor? Classy.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment