I have to write 2 paragraphs on this editorial but i dont understand it, can someone please help!?

This is the editorial



Talk Turns To Jive About Ayers

INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY



Posted 10/10/2008



Campaign '08: Barack Obama now says he knew who Bill Ayers was but thought he was "rehabilitated." And they say McCain is erratic! Where are the fact-checkers when you need them?





--------------------------------------鈥?br>


Read More: Election 2008





--------------------------------------鈥?br>




In an interview with sympathetic Philadelphia radio talk show host Michael Smerconish, taped Thursday and broadcast Friday, Obama changed the story of his relationship with Weatherman terrorist William Ayers yet again. He even had the chutzpah to lay the matter at the feet of Ronald Reagan.



"Ultimately, I ended up learning about the fact that (Ayers) had engaged in this reprehensible act 40 years ago, but I was 8 years old at the time and I assumed that he had been rehabilitated," Obama said.



You'd think a graduate of Columbia University and Harvard Law School would have known that the actions of America's premier terrorist bomber did not, due to tainted evidence, result in a single day of prison time. So just when and where did he think Bill Ayers was rehabilitated?



And just when and where did Obama learn about "this reprehensible act"? He does not say. But when you meet someone for the first time and end up in his house as he hosts your first fundraiser, isn't it customary to inquire about his background?



Michelle Obama was asked about the relationship on "Larry King Live" on Thursday. "I don't know anyone in Chicago who is heavily involved in education policy who doesn't know Bill Ayers," she said. Or his background?



When Obama did find out, and learned Ayers did not regret his deeds, the savvy and politically ambitious Obama should have dropped him like the plague. Instead, he lied (and that's the only word for it) about their relationship.



"The gentleman in question, Bill Ayers, is a college professor, teaches education at the University of Illinois," Obama told Smerconish. "That's how I met him 鈥?working on a school reform project that was funded by an ambassador and very close friend of Ronald Reagan's" along with "a bunch of conservative businessmen and civic leaders." This is the mother of all stretches.



University of Illinois records show that in the 1990s, Ayers was instrumental in starting the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, securing a $50 million grant to reform the Chicago Public Schools, part of a national initiative funded by Walter Annenberg, the former ambassador who died in 2002.



Annenberg wanted to reform schools, but certainly not along the socialist lines intended by Bill Ayers, who sees Venezuela's system as a model and has a mutual admiration society going with Hugo Chavez. And to suggest Ronald Reagan had any connection is obscene.



In a Thursday column in the Philadelphia Daily News, Smerconish writes that "the facts suggest that Ayers is on the periphery of Obama's public life." This, we suppose, is Latin for "just a guy who lives in the neighborhood," as Obama claims. In fact, Obama and Ayers worked intimately on many projects and served on boards together, routinely exchanging ideas.



As reported on pajamasmedia.com, Obama's first known meeting with Ayers had to occur in Chicago in 1987. Ayers was an activist in the Alliance for Better Chicago Schools. Community organizer Obama's Developing Communities Project was a member of that alliance.



The canard that Ayers' crimes occurred when Obama was 8 is irrelevant. Obama was 24 at the time of the Weathermen's last attacks. He was 29 when the last remnants of the Weather Underground and the affiliated May 19th Communist Organization were sentenced to prison in 1990. Surely Ayers' background was in news accounts.



The claim that Barack Obama did not know who Ayers was when he launched his political career in Ayers' living room is bogus. Ayers was a player in Chicago's radical left politics. So was Obama, who has a problem with the truth.



I have to write 2 paragraphs on this editorial but i dont understand it, can someone please help!?
You have to write 2 pp on the above editorial? It is simple. I have been investigating Obama. Do not use Google-they give Obama $. Use livesearch.com or dogpile.com, they are better.

It is not a question of Ayers being rehabilitated. It is that Obama seems to have been "rehabilitated" from the person he was before he began his Presidential campaigning. He is a chamelian, who changes to what he thinks you want to see and hear. Ck his voting record against what he says. I have and big surprise, he voted for tax increases all the time, he voted for amnesty for terrorists.

Are his previous actions congruent with what he is now saying?

I just had to correct the source, the one below is the one on terrorists.

He says he is for gay rights. My son is gay. Obama supported a Gay High School in his neighborhood that will segregate gays. The school will open in 2010 when his daughter will be 11 or 12, just before she has to go to High School. Did he support it so his girl doesn't have to go to school with gays? Obama is a hypocrit.

Why do you think the stock market is tanking today? People who understand Obama's tax plan know it will bring a depression.

I hope anyone reading this will investigate and LOOK AT OBAMA'S VOTING RECORD!!!!! Don't use Obama's obamavotingrecord site-it picks out only certain ones. Use the Government Senate site below. See in 2006 where he voted NO to prohibit Iraq from giving amnesty to terrorist. In other words OK to free the terrorists.I have to write 2 paragraphs on this editorial but i dont understand it, can someone please help!?
So many Obama supporters are just Poo-Pooing this as mudslinging from the Republican party. However, Obama seems to be willing to use anyone who has money or influence as a rung up the ladder of success. Many black Americans idolize Obama and refuse to believe anything bad about him, but he can't just say "I didn't know about Ayers." That just doesn't make any sense.

Most of the major networks have ignored this story until just recently, and this is why conservatives and Republicans are saying that NBC, CNBC, CBS, etc., are very biased toward Liberals and Democrats.

You have to wonder about Obama and how honest a person is he when we see him change his opinions about so many things when he sees it will earn him more votes. Politics can be very dirty.