How dangerous is obamamania?...anyone who is aware of what is happening should LEARN...but will they?

.Without unfound support from his millions of supporters, Obama will stumble into disaster.





I have carefully watched the new President’s first 100 days and we are appalled. and fOUND that Obama has continued Bush policies affecting the abuses of Wall Street banks, and allowing Wall Street wrongdoers to manage our economy and the "recovery."


What about his saying about prosecuting those bankers who profited from the most massive fraudulent swindle in human history? What about him saying he would call out names,,NOT.





The CNBC TV Documentary House of Cards explained in detail with surprisingly candid on camera, guilt free admissions by the wrong-doers how this swindle worked from the borrowers and mortgage salesmen in Los Angeles to the top CEOs of Wall Street and to the Fed..in tone.


Why ia Obama afraid to name names and cite the fraudulent acts of those responsible?, and the specific violations of law. ignoring and acting contrary to this accumulated human wisdom.


The legal elements or requirements of the crime or wrong of fraud known to every first year law student are taught.


President Obama is a lawyer, and a ten year professor of Constitutional Law. His roots are in Chicago politics. President Obama clearly knows the elements of fraud. .


Sadly we voters and generations of our offspring will suffered almost incalculable damage…damage totaling many trillions of dollars that will plague us for generations.


PRESIDENT OBAMA IS NOT FAITHFULLY EXECUTING THE LAW seizeing way too much private "mafia-like" power over all of us. President Obama can and must follow the law.


OBAMA’S CHOSEN FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC ADVISORS KNOWINGLY DEREGULATED SO AS TO ENABLE THE FRAUD, AND THEN PARTICIPATED IN THE FRAUD AND PROFITED FROM IT





In addition to paying his own taxes, Timothy Geithner had a public responsibility and duty to all of us. Timothy Geithner, the man chiefly responsible for avoiding what has happened, instead facilitated the fraud. He did not supervise and he did not regulate.


AND%26gt;%26gt;%26gt;%26gt;%26gt;%26gt;%26gt;


PRESIDENT OBAMA IS KNOWINGLY AND INTENTIONALLY REWARDING CRIMINALS AND IS COVERING UP WALL STREET BANK CRIMES AND FRAUD.





It is a felony for any person including the President of the United States to cover up a crime.





Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.





Such a cover up is also criminal fraud ,.-%26lt;%26gt;





Such a cover up when done by a President, Vice President or a Secretary of Treasury is also a "high crime and misdemeanor" warranting impeachment under Article II, Section 4 of our Constitution:





"The president, vice president and all other civil officers of the United States shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of…high crimes and misdemeanors."





President Obama has also taken the Presidential Oath that he will faithfully execute this cover up avoidance law as well, and not to violate it himself.


Obama, in a recent speech to Wall Street CEOs telling them to "cool it" about justifying their contract rights to bonuses, said





"My administration is the only thing between you and the pitchforks."





So what is he saying to the 80% of us potentially holding pitchforks who voted for him?





In effect, he is saying in his vague, charming, persuasive and hypnotic way: "I know of no crimes. I want to look to the future I will not prosecute the bankers. I will hire them as advisors. We have nothing to learn from their mistakes. We together will try to restore lending, and restart the economy as it was."





What are President Obama’s own lawyers, Dawn Johnson Chief of the Office of Legal Counsel and Attorney General Eric Holder advising him? Are they, like John Yoo and Michael Mukasey who advised Bush that he could torture, advising Obama that he has the power to ignore the law created exactly for the purpose of dealing with failing banks because of an economic emergency? What is brilliant lawyer Obama advising himself? Where is there indication of Obama’s own integrity and inner moral compass?





WHAT ARE THE CONSEQUENCES FOR US IF OBAMA’S MUTI-TRILLION BAIL OUT OF WALL STREET "SUCCEEDS?"





The most immediate, pressing danger is that it will not work at all. Obama may not discover this until it is too late to try another solution. The reason is Obama seeks mainly to restore the lending ability of the Wall Street banks. That will work only if we are willing to fund our purchases by more borrowing. We are not. We will not borrow. We are too frightened. The great danger is of a total breakdown of civilized democratic society.





Even if it "works," Obama’s plan will never succeed for us. The reasons are:





Obama and his advisors see capitalism as a stable system|||wow..sur got some nasty answers..but..what do you expext from onaamas?


they likely either were unable to stay on task to read your questin..


of they could not understand it!


obaams are like that..lol..most of them if asked would say the sarah pallin said she can see russia from her livingroom..lol..she NEVER said that..TINA Fey did..


obamaohiles..gotta love em for laffs they can bring ya!|||If you choose to dribble crap like this, please articulate yourself and organize your thoughts in your head before writing them down.|||That isn't a question, it is a political rant.|||I have no idea what you are talking about. You say he covered up crime, yet you give no examples and I do not believe it is true at all, particularly since you don't even know what it was. If you are going to throw out random lies, you may as well give some facts or details.|||This is a questions/answers "forum". You have certainly tons of blogs or other forums available for politics and/or strangely incompetent journalism.


And certainly not in the language section here.